Showing posts with label Reference. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Reference. Show all posts

4/07/2010

Review of A Writer's Coach: An Editor's Guide to Words That Work (Hardcover)

Writing coach Jack Hart just published the best book about the craft of writing since William Zinsser's classic "On Writing Well."
"A Writer's Coach: An Editor's Guide to Words that Work," comes at a good time. Bad books come out of printing houses, magazines disappear, and newspaper continue to commit slow suicide, writing about government infrastructure or "converting" to online under the theory that two-paragraph text information bursts are what readers desperately crave.
(Actually, what readers crave is video, a lot more video than writers or newspapers are giving them...but fundamentally, with that video, what they really want are STORIES).
Jack is a writer's editor who knows how to build great stories. Readers might want more video these days, but they have hungered for good stories since long before a blind Greek began to dictate the first chanting lines of the Iliad. The online world will figure this out, probably sooner rather than later, and when they do, the reading public will find good stories, video and text, all of them containing the same fundamentals that Homer used to create his masterpieces. There are 12 fundamentals, actually:Method, Process, Structure, Force, Brevity, Clarity, Rhythm, Humanity, Color, Voice, Mechanics, Mastery.
Those are Hart's 12 chapter headings in "Writer's Coach, but they were the 12 tools of Homer and Aeschylus and Shakespeare and Orson Welles and Steven Spielberg and any storyteller who's ever captivated an audience.
What appears underneath those simple chapter headings is some of the best instruction anyone could have about how to become a skilled writer, and Jack does it by bringing clarity to the most complex ideasOne of the hardest writing concepts I ever tried to memorize, for example, is the "ladder of abstraction," the profound idea that all words exist on a continuum running from the absolutely concrete to the cosmically abstract. It's a valuable idea for a writer to memorize, and in the ten years since I encountered it I could never make it stick in my head, until I saw this in Jack's chapter called "Color." Here's a ladder anyone can grasp:

LADDER OF ABSTRACTION:
Everything there is
Living things
Vertebrates
Humanity
Americans
American truck drivers
Portland truck drivers
Acme Freight truck drivers
Fred

Jack's book demystifies writing while deftly explaining the classic underpinnings of writing as classic art. As a newspaper editor he's edited two Pulitzer-prize-winning stories and contributed to a third; he`s long been known as one of the great coaches of writing in the country. In each chapter, he takes apart the mechanics of writing the way a gifted mechanic take apart a car, showing in an engaging way how each part works and how it all fits into a whole. For anyone like me who desperately wants to get better at writing, this is the book to have.
The best part about this is that Jack lets loose the confident and catty soul of wit. Turn to nearly any page, and you'll see it:
"Some writers bristle at the very sound of the word `outlining.' But please put aside all those negative connotations that linger from the outlines your grade school teachers forced you to do. Forget Roman numerals. Forget subheadings and sub-subheadings. All you need is a quick-and-dirty summary that cuts right to the key points."
/
"Why should writing be agony?" he asks. "Physically, writing's relatively easy work. Take it from a guy who's loaded log ships, pumped gas, and tarred roofs in the midsummer sun. Writers work on their butts and out of the weather. So what's with all the whining?"
/
"Of all the devices that can add humanity to your writing, the direct quotation is the most overused. A newspaper sports story or a traditional news feature may contain a direct quote in every other paragraph, a practice that usually produces a parade of inane or merely dull utterances. Great magazine writers repeatedly demonstrate that the direct quote is expendable, writing five thousand words or more without resorting to one direct quote."

Reading Jack's book about craftsmanship reminds me of a crew of workmen I worked for in the summer of 1975. The carpenters were small-town men from Kansas who chewed tobacco, talked wistfully about women, drank cheap beer in their private hours, and paid attention to the exactness demanded by their craft.Every move they made had a purpose: "Keepin' everything square with the world," they called it. They used chalked string snap-lines to quickly lay down a straight line on a row of boards to make a cut; they used levels to keep the floors and stud boards straight; they studied diagrams, placed boards and made cuts in a sequence that put a building together that could stand for centuries. They knew the names, purposes and nuances of every tool, every grain of wood and every sequence of process that they laid their hands to.
Most writers, in contrast, just start typing, which is why so many stories fall apart in their hands or don't get read by an audience.
Not one of those carpenters, as far as I know, has ever attended the Poynter Institute's national writing workshops, or the annual Nieman Narrative Writing conference in Boston, where Jack speaks to packed rooms; but those guys with the toolkits would have recognized him as a craftsman. Great writing is mostly craftsmanship, with just a brushstroke of art, and Jack is an engaging teacher of both.
Here is Jack, explaining why writers write badly, or succumb to writers' block, or see a story with great potential fall apart in their hands:
"The tendency to see the task ahead as overwhelming explains most keyboard anxiety. For a variety of reasons, we view writing from the back end. Day in and day out, we witness the finished work of accomplished writers. In our minds' eye we stroll down street after street of beautiful homes, ignorant of the piece-by-piece construction that created them, one two-by-four at a time. `Look at that gorgeous building,' we think. `The craftsmanship. The detail work. The sheer size of the thing. I could never build something like that.' "
Jack explains all, from how to conceptualize and create to how to begin laying out steps that make a story stand tall.

Other samplings from the book:
"The secret to writing well is in the process, not the finished product. You get better not by sitting down at the keyboard and trying to match the finished work of good writers, but by changing the way you work.
/
"Think first; write later. Why hurry to the keyboard if you're just going to sit there, stressing out and string at a blank screen? Pave your way to a first draft with some sort of rough plan. Scan your notes. Jot down key points. Ask yourself some questions. If you have two hours to write, take an hour to prepare. If you're fifteen minutes from deadline, take five to think."
/
"Shrink your subject. Most of us are way too ambitious when we set out to write. So we end up with a Missouri Basin phenomenon---a flood that's a mile wide and an inch deep. Give your readers some depth so that they can enjoy the water. Pick the most interesting, unusual, or surprising aspect of your subject and dive in."







Click Here to see more reviews about: A Writer's Coach: An Editor's Guide to Words That Work (Hardcover)

3/28/2010

Review of The Reporter's Handbook: An Investigator's Guide To Documents and Techniques (Hardcover)

This book reads like a text book- so if you need a quick reference guide to background checks I would recommend buying this one in addition to somehting like Dennis King's - Get the Facts on Anyone. I've just started reading it but so far it's very informative.



Click Here to see more reviews about: The Reporter's Handbook: An Investigator's Guide To Documents and Techniques (Hardcover)

3/12/2010

Review of Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary) (Hardcover)

Noah Webster wrote the first American English dictionary in the 1806 and his name has come to be synonymous with the word "dictionary" in the US. As a result, every dictionary in the US that wants to make anysales calls itself a "Webster's."

The M-W, however, is theoriginal and still the best. I have every major American English dictionaryin publication, and several British dictionaries, including the RandomHouse, the Webster's 3rd (the unabridged dictionary), Microsoft'sdictionary, the Oxford Dictionary, and several learner'sdictionaries.

Frankly, the differences among the top three,i.e., the M-W,the Random House, and the Microsoft (on CD), are not that great--choose aword like "efficiency" and see how each is defined. You mightthink they were all working together. That said, I have so say the M-W isstill my favorite. Further, the M-W dictionary is consistently rated #1 insurveys of academics and language scholar.

I am a professional languageand test preparation instructor and rely on good dictionaries for precisedefinitions of words. The M-W consistently gives clear, accuratedictionaries and apposite examples. One extra feature that helps wordlovers like me understand the words better is that M-W lists definitions inthe order that they came into use, with the most recent usage last. Thistype of listing is extremely helpful for understanding how a word hasevolved and what it is about that word that remains and what is notessential to the meaning. Such an understanding of words is essential forGRE and SAT preparation and is one of the main reasons I regularly turn tothe M-W.

In short, it's your best option for an American Englishdictionary.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary (Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary) (Hardcover)

2/27/2010

Review of Oxford American Dictionary and Thesaurus (Hardcover)

Perhaps I will end up buying the Oxford English Reference Dictionary at some point, but presently, this Oxford American Dictionary and Thesaurus 1st Ed is great.I don't care about slang or computer definitions in my dictionary, English has always been English, and while American may be different in spelling, it is still English.Internet, blog, PCMCIA, ARP, .NET, Mono, etc... is in computer books, which is where it should be.I don't expect my dictionary to have the recipe for Rice Balls or the proper pronunciation of this common variation of a Japanese dish, now perhaps coming towards being cross-cultural.I expect that information to be in a cookbook.

However, in words, it's wonderful.Why?That's easy; I believe it's because it had 'anfractuosity' as well as the minimum of 3 decent definitions for 'numinous'.This was the smallest dictionary I could find that had all the words in the Prologue of 'The Problem of Pain' by CS Lewis.Any dictionary that can match words with the vocabulary that CS Lewis expressed is all that I need.

Some other thoughts... I've been reading dictionary reviews for 20 minutes, and I think there are too many people that are trying to get subject specific with their dictionaries.Dictionaries should be ENGLISH specific.It's all this slang, idioms, and subject specific vocabulary that has dropped my vocabulary to sad terms.Between that application, and the genuine desire of individuals around the world to give the wrong definition to words such as feminine, it's no wonder the young are becoming less educated while spending more time in school.

New English... There is no such thing.English is English.It's been essentially the same for much longer than I've been alive.

Still, you should definitely get a dictionary of slang and idioms.It's good to know what people are saying in a specific region/country.





Click Here to see more reviews about: Oxford American Dictionary and Thesaurus (Hardcover)

2/25/2010

Review of The New York Times Practical Guide to Practically Everything: The Essential Companion for Everyday Life (Hardcover)

I checked this book out from the library and after only a few pages I knew I must have it! It has sections written by many experts in their field. For example Bob Vila wrote about home renovation, and how long you can expect certain things to last, like drywall, and roofs. There was a section on how to scale and filet a fish with pictures I know I will refer to in the future. Also loved the section on how to pick out a good sofa, I knew nothing about coil count or that % of goose feather in the padding will let you know how soft the sofa could be. And that padding on the arms of a new sofa was particularly important because that's where you are more like to see wear and tear. The more I'm reading this book the more I'm learning. And although this doesn't completely delve into every subject, it enlightens me enough to point me in the right direction and is really enjoyable read. It has subjects that I feel I'm an expert in and don't need any more advice (such as Pets, Home technology and travel). And it also has subjects I want to learn more about and am far from an expert like gardening, real estate, parenting, investing, career paths, and so much more. I'm impressed by how much is in this book and how clearly things are explained. I would recommend this book to anyone and I know that I will be referencing it again.



Click Here to see more reviews about: The New York Times Practical Guide to Practically Everything: The Essential Companion for Everyday Life (Hardcover)

2/20/2010

Review of Encyclopedia of Television (Hardcover)

Obviously marketed to University and College libraries. Overpriced. I bought it at a discount shop for a bargain ($45) and the information is staggering. I caught a couple errors but one has to be extremely knowledgeable to catch the mistakes.

If you are a millionaire and have money to throw around, this is worth it. But do not expect perfection. Apple cider is better than champagne unless you can afford it...



Click Here to see more reviews about: Encyclopedia of Television (Hardcover)

2/13/2010

Review of The American Heritage Deluxe Reference Set [DELUXE EDITION] (Hardcover)

I bought this dictionary because I was in need of a collage level dictionary.
I think dictionary is very good i have it for more than 6 months now as long as i remember there is just one word i couldn't find in it.
The overall quality of the book and the cover is more than acceptable.
I gave 4 star because I found a similar one better price after i bougnt this.



Click Here to see more reviews about: The American Heritage Deluxe Reference Set [DELUXE EDITION] (Hardcover)

2/11/2010

Review of Real Estate Valuation in Litigation, Second Edition (Hardcover)

The author addresses appraisal subjects in the terms and in a context that an appraiser normally communicates.He provides adequate legal explanations and court case reference, so, the appraiser can communicate with their legal counsel & clients.It is extremely insightful for all who are doing any type of court or property tax appraisals.It is slanted to condemnation assignments, however, the appraisal & legal principals are enunciated clearly enough that, they are easily extended to property tax and estate appraisal assignments.It has been helpful to my work my Ad Valorem assignments.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Real Estate Valuation in Litigation, Second Edition (Hardcover)

2/04/2010

Review of Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language (Hardcover)

As a writer I could not properly do my work without my Webster's. Granted, it is a bit big to use as a desktop dictionary for looking up the proper spelling of a word. Then again, that is not the purpose of an unabridged dictionary. If one is building a reference library the unabridged dictionary is just as necessary as a thesaurus.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Webster's Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary of the English Language (Hardcover)

1/31/2010

Review of Bryson's Dictionary of Troublesome Words (Hardcover)

Not to gild the lily, this is to all intents and purposes a basically good book. Hopefully, it will be utilized to put an end to grammatical and usage errors, as well as misuse of apostrophe's, "quotation marks" and other punctuation.

If that paragraph above does not give you the dry heaves, you need to read Bill Bryson's "Dictionary."

Unfortunately, much as I enjoyed this book, I'm afraid it will appeal primarily to people who already know a lot of this information, instead of to the many who would benefit from reading it. And that's too bad ("The belief that *and* should not be used to begin a sentence is without foundation. And that's all there is to it." [p. 13]).

As Bryson notes, this book is not a style or usage guide. For that, I would recommend Fowler and Wallraff, sources Bryson often cites, and especially Bill Walsh's Lapsing Into a Comma : A Curmudgeon's Guide to the Many Things That Can Go Wrong in Print--and How to Avoid Them. What this book does provide is a useful guide to clarity of expression through precise use of language. While many people may not know, or care, about the distinctions between "lectern," "podium," "dais," and "rostrum" (p. 119), for example, the distinctions are nevertheless important, and Bryson helps nail them down.

He makes the important point that English is a language without a governing authority. Tradition and usage define what's proper. Language is evolutionary -- an example, as Hayek noted, of spontaneous order. However, it's possible to take this idea too far. In the Introduction (a passage quoted on the back cover as well), Bryson says, "If you wish to say 'between you and I' or to use *fulsome* in the sense of lavish, it is your privilege to do so...". I'm not certain this is the sort of advice people necessarily need to hear, unless of course you add the important corollary that the rest of us have the privilege of considering you an idiot for doing so.

Apart from that, though, this is an entertaining as well as useful read, and one I encourage writers both professional and casual to keep handy.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Bryson's Dictionary of Troublesome Words (Hardcover)

1/29/2010

Review of Encyclopedia of Real Estate Terms, Third Edition (Hardcover)

Complete and comprehensive - never have those words rung truer than when one looks at "Encyclopedia of Real Estate Terms". With well over 1,500 pages of information on the real estate game, "Encyclopedia of Real Estate Terms" is composed and compiled by Damien Abbot, a man who has been involved in three billion dollars worth of real estate transactions during his globe-spanning, over forty year career. Now in its third edition, "Encyclopedia of Real Estate Terms" is a must for anyone getting into the world of real estate, and an invaluable reference for any seasoned agent who wants to stay on top of the game. "Encyclopedia of Real Estate Terms" is highly recommended for community library Real-Estate and reference collections.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Encyclopedia of Real Estate Terms, Third Edition (Hardcover)

Review of Garner's Modern American Usage (Hardcover)

For three generations, a single book dominated the market as the authoritative reference in matters of grammar, style, and usage in the English language: "A Dictionary of Modern English Usage" by H.W. Fowler, first published in 1926, ably revised by Sir Ernest Gowers in 1965, and now in its third edition (published 1996). But by the century's last quarter, the modern English language -- particularly its American dialect -- had begun outgrowing Fowler, and several newer guides began competing with it. The third (1996) edition of Fowler was a disappointment, and left the field without a clear leading authority.

That gap was filled in 1998, when Bryan A. Garner wrote "A Dictionary of Modern American Usage" (published by the Oxford University Press, which also published Fowler). Finally, someone had written a book that matched Fowler -- not only in its erudition, but also in its accessible style, and even its wry sense of humor. And Garner's book had the advantages of being written both in modern times for a modern audience, and in the United States by an American author about American English. The book is a gem, and as authoritative a reference as you will find in this field in the last several decades (and probably the next several too).

"Garner's Modern American Usage" is this oustanding work's second edition, now retitled after its author in view of the acclaim that the first edition earned. A new edition is appearing after only five years because, as Garner explains, "changing usage isn't really the primary basis for a new edition of a usage guide: it's really a question of having had five more years for research." The payoff shows. And the second edition builds upon the first: the first edition was a dictionary of words in usage, rather than words about usage, and therefore assumed that the reader possessed a certain working knowledge of basic grammatical terms and concepts. For example, the first edition didn't define such basic terms as "sentence," "phrase," "clause," "word," or "part of speech." The second edition appends a glossary that defines many such basic concepts. It also appends, as did the first edition, an 11-page chronology of books about usage, which illustrates both the rich tradition that Garner's work joins, as well as the tremendous resources upon which he drew in producing this magnum opus.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Garner's Modern American Usage (Hardcover)

1/09/2010

Review of Roget's Thesaurus of Phrases (Hardcover)

Have you ever been writing and desperately needed another idea for a two-word or longer phrase?Have you consulted your thesaurus and found nothing that matched?If so, this clever thesaurus of phrases is for you.

Some of the thesaurus phrases are fairly technical or formal; for example, Einstein's Theory of Relativity can also be described as the "principle of equivalence" and Darwin's natural selection can be called the "law of the jungle."However, most of the phrases are more colloquial in nature; for example, look up "down-and-out" and you'll find clever substitutes, such as "in the poorhouse" and "on the skids."In addition, a short "phrase maker" section is included at the end of the thesaurus, which provides words that can be paired together.For example, look up "information" and the phrase maker suggests "confidential" or "classified" as modifiers.

This thesaurus is likely to be useful for most any writer, whether your writing is creative or more technical.The only debit is that phrases are not cross-listed, so "in the poorhouse" is not an entry; one has to divine the correct listing for the book to be useful.This problem, however, is a minor inconvenience compared to the likely use writers of all sorts will derive.Highly recommended.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Roget's Thesaurus of Phrases (Hardcover)

1/07/2010

Review of Microsoft Encarta College Dictionary: The First Dictionary For The Internet Age (Hardcover)

Americans, and college students in particular, are spoiled for choice in the matter of dictionaries. There are five good college dictionaries and you won't go wrong buying any of them, so the remarks here are addressed to why the Microsoft Encarta College Dictionary might be the one for you. It is the newest of all the college dictionaries. This is both a strength and a weakness. The more mature dictionaries have had the opportunity of going through multiple editions, correcting small errors and inconsistencies that have been caught by careful readers at each stage. This has not happened yet with Encarta, as other reviewers have noted. On the other hand, Encarta has many up-to-date technical and scientific terms that have not appeared in the other dictionaries yet, and it is the strongest contender by far for inclusion of computer-related terminology and acronyms, an area of vocabulary that sends many readers to the dictionary these days. Encarta is also particularly good at including compounds with specific denotation that are not transparent to the general reader: neurolinguistic programming, intermediate bulk container, sieve tube element, to name a few.

The essay in the front of the dictionary, "Usage in Crisis?" sets out the rationale for the inclusion many of the dictionary's special features. It's two pages long and worth reading to determine if you're in the class of people that is better served by this dictionary than its competitors. If you're a college student who has difficulty spelling or who struggles with the distinction between its and it's, or their, there, and they're, this is the book for you.

This dictionary has considerably more British bias than any of the other college dictionaries. Subtle British bias leaks through in both the headword list and in definition language. For example, the dictionary includes the fairly obscure, and not difficult to understand British vulgarism f...wit," yet does not have an entry for the far more common, and less transparent American slang term "dirtball." The definition at "tag wrestling" notes that competitors "take it in turns . . ." The American idiom is simply "take turns" and would have sufficed here. The flipside and upside of this bias is that you'll find better coverage in this dictionary of British English than the other college dictionaries provide.

For those who enjoy lingering over pages in the dictionary, this one is far easier on the eyes than most. The distinct typeface of the headwords easily sets them off from the definition text. The quick definitions in long entries are a useful way of navigating through them while looking for a particular sense. As a completely new dictionary, the Encarta is not encumbered by a tradition of style and presentation format that was developed long before the information age. Its fresh start in terms of presentation and inclusion support its claim to be the first dictionary of the Internet age.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Microsoft Encarta College Dictionary: The First Dictionary For The Internet Age (Hardcover)

12/25/2009

Review of Random House Webster's College Dictionary (Hardcover)

I write as a hobby and am a reference book addict. I own 10 dictionaries. I've had my copy of RH/Webster's for 3 years and have yet to find a word not listed in stunning detail. Buy this dictionary!



Click Here to see more reviews about: Random House Webster's College Dictionary (Hardcover)

12/22/2009

Review of America's Popular Sayings: Over 1600 Expressions on Topics from Beauty to Money and Everything In Between (Hardcover)

I really like this book.It's full of all of those witty sayings you wish you could come up with in your daily diatribe with co-workers, and debates with friends.But, the appendix is horrible.When trying to find the right saying, it shouldn't solely be based on the keyword of a noun found in the quote itself.It would be nice, rather, if this appendix was based on an idea you want to convey.



Click Here to see more reviews about: America's Popular Sayings: Over 1600 Expressions on Topics from Beauty to Money and Everything In Between (Hardcover)

Review of America's Popular Sayings: Over 1600 Expressions on Topics from Beauty to Money and Everything In Between (Hardcover)

I really like this book.It's full of all of those witty sayings you wish you could come up with in your daily diatribe with co-workers, and debates with friends.But, the appendix is horrible.When trying to find the right saying, it shouldn't solely be based on the keyword of a noun found in the quote itself.It would be nice, rather, if this appendix was based on an idea you want to convey.



Click Here to see more reviews about: America's Popular Sayings: Over 1600 Expressions on Topics from Beauty to Money and Everything In Between (Hardcover)

12/13/2009

Review of Oxford American College Dictionary (Hardcover)

This 2002 book is an abridgement of the excellent New Oxford American Dictionary (NOAD, published 2001), with a price in line with other college dictionaries.Unfortunately, there seem to be a few problem areas.

The first thing that will strike many college students and graduates is the almost complete absence of etymologies.A few of the more interesting ones are highlighted with the heading WORD HISTORY; for example, this is one of very few sources that make clear why the Dutch for "the cage" appears in English as DECOY.A few other etymologies appear with the heading ORIGIN.For the most part, you won't find any.It would seem that such information would add a lot to many entries, such as UBUNTU, TRIFFID, GROK, TOHUBOHU, and thousands more.One consequence is that the usage note for ESKIMO refers to a deleted etymology.Granted, the etymologies in most competitors have a lot of fluff; they'll show two of numerous older spellings of "dog" before implying that the trail grows cold in Old English; a simple "<OE" or "OE<?"should be enough.The datings that appear in a few competitors and some other Oxford dictionaries would be a fine addition.

In a brief survey of one-word lowercase entries from LI to LIEDER in this and three comparable (college) dictionaries, it appears that coverage in this dictionary is nearly as good.It is, however, the only one to omit LIAISE, LIBELANT, LIBELEE, LICENSURE, and an adjectival form for LIBATION (but the competitors disagree, two showing LIBATIONARY, one LIBATIONAL).This dictionary relegates LIBERALISM to a run-on, a word for which the competition had relatively long entries; the difference is partly offset by a longer entry for LIBERAL.But it was the only one not to relegate LIBERTARIANISM to a run-on.It has only run-ons for LIBERATION, LICHENOLOGY, and LIBRETTIST (the precise relation between a librettist and a libretto is not one of the senses given elsewhere for the suffix -IST).Two competitors explain the missing LIDLESS, a poetic form that may well still be met in colleges.It is the only one to list LICENSED, a form unlikely to be sought.Elsewhere, it is not hard to find entries that all the competitors omit; WAQF and CINQ will intrigue Scrabblers.

More than a dozen pages are blank.This is certainly a surprise, since most publishers allot their lexicographers however many pages can be printed affordably for the intended sales price, and they scramble to squash the available material into what seems to be too small a space.Larger Oxford dictionaries would provide plenty of material for filling these pages up.

No doubt Roger Staubach is pleased to have an entry, and would be even more so if his name were spelled correctly.It's unclear whether users would expect to find anything about him in a dictionary, but this one tries to include a lot of currently famous sports and entertainment personalities, and users might enjoy this feature.Cal Ripken makes an appearance too, but since the entry hasn't been updated, his 2001 retirement is unnoted.The space devoted to Perry, a tennis star from the thirties, might have been better devoted to Commodore Perry in a college dictionary, and there are many similar examples.

Unnecessarily in my opinion, an illustration for skyscraper has been edited to remove the World Trade Center.There are quite a number of illustrations, many adding little besides a break in what some readers might consider monotonous text.Whoever drew the picture for hyperbola has little appreciation for asymptotes.Every country comes with a large map, showing very few cities other than capitals, and mostly useless.The result is that the Northern Mariana Islands are shown with greater detail than in the National Geographic Atlas, while most of the largest U.S. cities appear on no map whatever.It's unclear that dictionary users expect maps, and those that do will probably look elsewhere.

Inevitably a new work has slipups here and there,of them possibly attributable to the abridgement.The entry for the noun SHANKS' MARE reads "used to walking"; you need the complete entry from NOAD to make any sense of the definition, which in itself is more of an explanation than something that can take the place of a noun.The symbol for SECOND didn't survive intact.The entries for GOODNESS and SAKE disagree on the punctuation of"for goodness' sake".Only the illustrative citation for Spartan hints that its metaphoric usage is now usually uncapitalized.And the spelling Stonehendge appears.At times one feels that one is the first human to be reading certain entries in their current form.Information for REIS, BO, SH, ADELGID, etc., is present, but not anywhere you are likely to look.On the other hand, "Sly" is cross-referenced to Stallone.

Kudos to Oxford for its sensible treatment of the spelling or usage of such entries as miniscule, flout/flaunt, plaintext, back seat, hopefully, disinterested, under way, supercede, they, and dozens more.Hopefully a future edition will have something to say against the spelling KI for the word pronounced CHI and now usually spelled QI.And hopefully we won't have to wait long for the Second Edition of this dictionary, a more patient and careful abridgement of NOAD.Except for price and portability, nearly all the pluses of this work are found in NOAD, while most of the minuses mentioned above are not in NOAD.For now, if you can afford only a college dictionary, I would have to recommend one of the others.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Oxford American College Dictionary (Hardcover)

12/06/2009

Review of Oxford English Reference Dictionary (Hardcover)

I only bought this dictionary because David Foster Wallace constantly raves about the "OED", which is a full (and expensive) twenty volume set. So this (...) book was more in my price range. Despite it's shorter length, I have definitely got more than my money's worth in this book. Sometimes I take a break from my day and pick it up and browse through the pages. Besides being able to find over 99% of the words for which I've searched, it's got an uncountable number of historical, geographical, etc. facts and backgrounders. If you're a learning nerd, this is a good book to have.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Oxford English Reference Dictionary (Hardcover)

12/04/2009

Review of Yankee Magazine's Living Well on a Shoestring: 1,501 Ingenious Ways to Spend Less for What You Need and Have More for What You Want (Hardcover)

The tips offered in this book fall into two categories:

1. Things you already know if you have a bit of common sense (Example: Fix the toilet if it leaks, or else the water will cost you money)

2. Things that do not make sense (Example: Disassemble you flashlight so you have a place to keep pens in the flashlight cylinder and don't need to buy a pen holder. Keep the flashlight parts somewhere, so you can put it back together in a power outage)

I admit, I am not an expert in frugal living. If you are, perhaps you will find the second category useful. With this book, we were looking to find some advice on how to save money. Out of the "1501 ingenious ways", there were two or three I found I could use. I will donate my copy to the local library. If you are interested in this book, I recommend you follow the advice of another reviewer and check it out from your library first.



Click Here to see more reviews about: Yankee Magazine's Living Well on a Shoestring: 1,501 Ingenious Ways to Spend Less for What You Need and Have More for What You Want (Hardcover)